nanog mailing list archives
Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6
From: Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:12:23 +0100 (BST)
You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7), see rfc4941. For Linux, you can also enable it, which is not a default.
In the context of "addresses I'm using to manage kit", having devices randomly renumber themselves at regular intervals does *not* sound like it's going to make my life easy :( Regards, Tim. _____ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- best practices for management nets in IPv6 Tom Ammon (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Rubens Kuhl (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Joel Maslak (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 James Harr (Jul 13)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Ryan Finnesey (Jul 17)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 FRLinux (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Tim Franklin (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Dave Hart (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Doug Barton (Jul 18)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Ryan Finnesey (Jul 18)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Frank Bulk (Jul 18)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Ryan Finnesey (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Paul Ebersman (Jul 23)
- Message not available
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 23)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 James Harr (Jul 13)