nanog mailing list archives
Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6
From: FRLinux <frlinux () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:32 +0100
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, James Harr <james.harr () gmail com> wrote:
If you really really need address obfuscation, you can still do NAT, but NAT from public addresses to public a public address or pool of
Well, You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7), see rfc4941. For Linux, you can also enable it, which is not a default. Steph _____ NANOG mailing list NANOG () nanog org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Current thread:
- best practices for management nets in IPv6 Tom Ammon (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Rubens Kuhl (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Cameron Byrne (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Joel Maslak (Jul 12)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 James Harr (Jul 13)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Ryan Finnesey (Jul 17)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 FRLinux (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Tim Franklin (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Dave Hart (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Doug Barton (Jul 18)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Ryan Finnesey (Jul 18)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Frank Bulk (Jul 18)
- RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Ryan Finnesey (Jul 18)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Paul Ebersman (Jul 23)
- Message not available
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Jeroen Massar (Jul 23)
- Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6 James Harr (Jul 13)