nanog mailing list archives
Re: in defense of lisp
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:09:13 -0700
On Jul 13, 2011 7:50 AM, "Seth Mos" <seth.mos () dds nl> wrote:
Op 13-7-2011 16:09, Randy Bush schreef:btw, a litte birdie told me to take another look atThe free Open Source FreeBSD based pfSense firewall supports this. Not everyone can get BGP, specifically calling out residential connections
here.
As a 1:1 NAT mechanism it works pretty well, I can reach the outside, and the outside can reach me. Which I think is what was intended in the specifications. And pretty much the internet. It took me 4 months to write the IPv6 support in pfSense to what it is today. Which is not feature complete. But the NPT part was just a few hours in the grand scheme. I've also contacted the nice people from the draft that we support it. Since then we've got v4 and v6 with BGP at work so it's moot. But I
digress.
Kind regards, Seth Mos pfSense developer.
Thank you for your work. CB
6296 IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation. M. Wasserman, F. Baker. June 2011. (Format: TXT=73700 bytes) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL) which also could be considered to be in the loc/id space randy
Current thread:
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF), (continued)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) steve ulrich (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Fred Baker (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Scott Brim (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Fred Baker (Jul 13)
- RE: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Ronald Bonica (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Fred Baker (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Dobbins, Roland (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Randy Bush (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Dobbins, Roland (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp Seth Mos (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp Cameron Byrne (Jul 13)
- Re: in defense of lisp (was: Anybody can participate in the IETF) Randy Bush (Jul 14)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Jeff Wheeler (Jul 12)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Luigi Iannone (Jul 13)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Damien Saucez (Jul 13)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Jeff Wheeler (Jul 13)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Luigi Iannone (Jul 13)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Luigi Iannone (Jul 13)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Eliot Lear (Jul 17)
- Re: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Jeff Wheeler (Jul 17)
- RE: Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?) Ronald Bonica (Jul 12)