nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
From: "Larry J. Blunk" <ljb () merit edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:11:47 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience with the IETF mailing list. It has had ongoing issues with out-of-sequence delivery. Based on the Received headers, it's seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal to the AMS servers. It appears they may be trying something different with the NANOG list as the IETF list does not employ bulk_mailer.ietf.org is mailman and postfix.
Right, should have mentioned that. Here's the Received headers from a message yesterday that apparently had a 23 hour delay internal to ietfa.amsl.org. You can also see it is out of sequence in the IETF mailing list archives. There are some other recent emails that were sent on July 8th and did not get delivered until Juth 11th. -Larry Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2011 11:06:29 -0400 Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7027F21F8CB4; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ietf () ietfa amsl com Delivered-To: ietf () ietfa amsl com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D7D21F8E58 for <ietf () ietfa amsl com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TAHKv2903pQw for <ietf () ietfa amsl com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6E321F8E4F for <ietf () ietf org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dn3-227.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6BG1O4H054438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:01:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben () nostrum com) Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Ben Campbell <ben () nostrum com> In-Reply-To: <AE447DE4-CD85-4386-9C97-2008524D2402 () nist gov> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:01:23 -0500 Message-Id: <5BB77043-1674-4FD6-87CB-17DDC1CEEC1C () nostrum com>
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward, (continued)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward jim deleskie (Jul 12)
- RE: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Chris Barlow (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Steve Feldman (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ben Carleton (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Jay Ashworth (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Brielle Bruns (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Jared Mauch (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Brielle Bruns (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Larry J. Blunk (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Joel Jaeggli (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Larry J. Blunk (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ben Carleton (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward James Cloos (Jul 13)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 13)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Aftab Siddiqui (Jul 12)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Richard Kulawiec (Jul 13)
- Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward Ben McGinnes (Jul 14)