nanog mailing list archives

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward


From: "Larry J. Blunk" <ljb () merit edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:11:47 -0400 (EDT)



----- Original Message -----

On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:

 I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience
with the IETF mailing list.  It has had ongoing issues with
out-of-sequence delivery.  Based on the Received headers, it's
seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal to the
AMS servers.  It appears they may be trying something different
with the NANOG list as the IETF list does not employ bulk_mailer.

ietf.org is mailman and postfix.



 Right, should have mentioned that.  Here's the Received headers
from a message yesterday that apparently had a 23 hour delay
internal to ietfa.amsl.org.  You can also see it is out of sequence in
the IETF mailing list archives.  There are some other recent emails
that were sent on July 8th and did not get delivered until Juth 11th.

 -Larry




Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30])
  by sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2011 11:06:29 -0400
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7027F21F8CB4;
        Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf () ietfa amsl com
Delivered-To: ietf () ietfa amsl com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D7D21F8E58
        for <ietf () ietfa amsl com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30])
        by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id TAHKv2903pQw for <ietf () ietfa amsl com>;
        Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net
        [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2])
        by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6E321F8E4F
        for <ietf () ietf org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-227.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121])
        (authenticated bits=0)
        by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6BG1O4H054438
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
        Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:01:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben () nostrum com)
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Ben Campbell <ben () nostrum com>
In-Reply-To: <AE447DE4-CD85-4386-9C97-2008524D2402 () nist gov>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:01:23 -0500
Message-Id: <5BB77043-1674-4FD6-87CB-17DDC1CEEC1C () nostrum com>






Current thread: