nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:03:50 -0600
On 1/13/2011 2:58 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
reload in 5 make changes verify things are working reload cancel It's a little different on a redundant processor system, as you have to reload both processors. It's also a 2-20 minute outage while you reload, but it does beat 2 hour drives.
Not at all the same... With JunOS, I can have the changes I made running for days, but, when some problem is later discovered I can still rollback to the previous (or several revisions back). I can easily compare the current config to several previous revisions, etc.
EDIT: </sarcasm>
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Scott Morris (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Bill Blackford (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Leo Bicknell (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)