nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Bill Blackford <bblackford () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:54:04 -0800
Subway subs started offering toasted as an option in response to the success of Quiznos Subs. So many vendors have been chasing the "me too" feature match behind Cisco for so many years it interesting to see Cisco doing the same behind Juniper. -b -- Bill Blackford Network Engineer Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges..... ig after a set time without a reboot. It still doesn't seem to be as nice as JUNOS rollback.
-- Bill Blackford Network Engineer Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Tony Varriale (Jan 13)
- Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Scott Morris (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Bill Blackford (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Magill (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 13)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Leo Bicknell (Jan 13)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Michael Ruiz (Jan 13)