nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?
From: Greg Whynott <Greg.Whynott () oicr on ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:13:16 -0500
i think it really depends on who answers your call. I've called Cisco a few times before for inter vendor issues and they gave us the " call the other vendor " finger. .. Other times they saved the day. i know some shops negotiate their support contract which precludes them from going threw the regular support escalation process. you get to speak to a more senior tech on the first 'hello'. -g On Jan 10, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Andrey Khomyakov <khomyakov.andrey () gmail com> said:There have been awfully too many time when Cisco TAC would just say that since the problem you are trying to troubleshoot is between Cisco and VendorX, we can't help you. You should have bought Cisco for both sides.That kind of behavior from a vendor tells me I shouldn't have bought that vendor for either side.
-- This message and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this message may not be that of the organization.
Current thread:
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jack Bates (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Saxon Jones (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Craig V (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Justin M. Streiner (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Paul Stewart (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Randy Carpenter (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Andrey Khomyakov (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? George Bonser (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Chris Adams (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Thomas Donnelly (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Jeff Kell (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Greg Whynott (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 10)
- RE: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Brandon Kim (Jan 10)
- Re: Is Cisco equpiment de facto for you? Seth Mattinen (Jan 10)