nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 10:11:57 -0500
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 09:57, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:
On Jan 7, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Tim Chown wrote:The main operational problem we see is denial of service caused byunintentional IPv6 RAs from hosts. Which is a whole other can of IPv6 worms, heh.
But atleast we are finally getting the solutions for those - RA-Guard, port ACLs, etc. /TJ (PS - Keep pushing vendors for more widespread support for those!)
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jima (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Kell (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document John Levine (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Julien Goodwin (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Kevin Oberman (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Robert E. Seastrom (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mark Smith (Jan 08)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 08)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document sthaug (Jan 05)