nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 08:46:32 -0600
On 1/7/2011 8:17 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
As RFC6018 suggests, this could be done dynamically on any given active subnet.
Unfortunately, I don't see support for it in major router vendors for service providers. Currently, flow + arp/ND/routing tables are utilized to determine a variety of situations, but even then, flow collection is limited at higher speeds.
I considered a 1 in 200 approach, but the iBGP tables will go through the roof for a single DHCPv6 pool in a single pop. I a worse problem with darknets than those scanning have with scanning a /64, especially since their scans are likely to be more targeted and not as random.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Miquel van Smoorenburg (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Message not available
- NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document William Allen Simpson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joel Jaeggli (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)