nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:20:29 -0500
On Thursday, January 06, 2011 10:51:27 am Jack Bates wrote:
There have been many implementations, mostly for security reasons, but also helping with this problem by implementing a "router MUST NOT send unsolicited arp requests". It's important that routers learn their table in another fashion.
Yeah, that's more succinct than what I said, but I think you're saying the same thing.
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document William Allen Simpson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joel Jaeggli (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Paul Ferguson (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Marcel Plug (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 06)