nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:11:55 -0800
On 1/31/11 10:43 PM, George Bonser wrote:
3. Busting out 16 more /8s only delays the IPv4 endgame by about a year. jmsIf used for general assignment, sure. But if used for what people have been begging for NAT444 middle-4 space. Well, that might work. Code update on the CPE is all it would take. The systems involved would never see it.
except when the tried to determine their external ip. and of course one of the big applications for cgnat is mobile where the cpe are the end systems... There are negligible benefits as far as I can tell from the vantage points of end systems to creating new private scope ipv4 regions at this late date. network operators see some but frankly each one comes with additional support costs as does using rfc1918... the difference is we've got a lot of experience with the latter even in nat444 envirnments.
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Jeremy (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Cameron Byrne (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Martin Millnert (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Martin Millnert (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Jimmy Hess (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Justin M. Streiner (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Jan 31)
- RE: quietly.... George Bonser (Jan 31)
- RE: quietly.... George Bonser (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Joel Jaeggli (Jan 31)
- RE: quietly.... George Bonser (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Joe Provo (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Jan 31)
- Re: quietly.... Jorge Amodio (Jan 31)