nanog mailing list archives
Re: Another v6 question
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:32:12 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Jared Mauch wrote:
The ipv6 zealots talking about anything but a /64 for end-site are talking about a "business class" service. Even with my static IPs at home, I have no need for more than a single /64 to be used in my wildest dreams. I could live with ~256 ips for the future. I consider my tech density "above-average".
I don't agree at all. I have 3 /64s in use in my home already. I could fairly easily go down to 2, but I definitely need at least 2.
I don't want to handle people like me differently, thus /56 for all residential customers makes a lot of sense. I see no downside.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Another v6 question, (continued)
- Re: Another v6 question Max Pierson (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Owen DeLong (Jan 26)
- Re: Another v6 question Roland Dobbins (Jan 26)
- Re: Another v6 question Max Pierson (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Mark Smith (Jan 30)
- Re: Another v6 question Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Owen DeLong (Jan 27)
- /64 is "enough" until 2021 for 90% of users (was Re: Another v6 question) Jared Mauch (Jan 27)
- Re: /64 is "enough" until 2021 for 90% of users (was Re: Another v6 question) Mark Smith (Jan 30)
- Re: Another v6 question Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Owen DeLong (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Per Carlson (Jan 28)
- Re: Another v6 question Mark Andrews (Jan 28)
- Re: Another v6 question Jimmy Hess (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Jack Bates (Jan 27)