nanog mailing list archives
Re: Another v6 question
From: Michiel Klaver <michiel () klaver it>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:04:44 +0100
At 22-07-28164 20:59, Max Pierson wrote:
> From the provider perspective, what is the prefix-length that most are accepting to be injected into your tables?? 2 or so years ago, I read where someone stated that they were told by ATT that they weren't planning on accepting anything smaller than a /32. So what if I get my shiny new /48 from ARIN and am already multi-homed??? Does ATT not want my business (which they wouldn't get if the first place, but for argument sake, yes, I chose to pick on ATT, sorry if I offended anyone :) I already see /40's /48's ,etc in the v6 table, so some folks are allowing /48 and smaller, so what is the new /24 in v6?
Hi Max, There is a Wikipedia article all about that:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_IPv6_support_by_major_transit_providers
And here is some more information about subnetting your IPv6 network: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_subnetting_reference
Current thread:
- Re: Another v6 question, (continued)
- Re: Another v6 question Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Owen DeLong (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Per Carlson (Jan 28)
- Re: Another v6 question Mark Andrews (Jan 28)
- Re: Another v6 question Jimmy Hess (Jan 27)
- Re: Another v6 question Jack Bates (Jan 27)