nanog mailing list archives

Re: Ipv6 for the content provider


From: David Freedman <david.freedman () uk clara net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:10:58 +0000



And if your servers behind the LB aren't prepared for it, you lose a LOT
of logging data, geolocation capabilities, and some other things if you
go that route.

Owen




I can't imagine an LB vendor who would sell a v6 to v4 vip solution who
wouldn't provide a way to inject the v6 addr in to the request as an
additional header? I suggest a naming-and-shaming is in order


-- 


David Freedman
Group Network Engineering
Claranet Group



Current thread: