nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:32:47 +0900
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p/All of the (mostly religious) arguments about /64 versus any smaller subnets aside, I'm curious about why one would choose /126 over /127 for P-to-P links?
see above randy
Current thread:
- IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Lasse Jarlskov (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Carlos Friacas (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Grzegorz Janoszka (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Marco Hogewoning (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links bmanning (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Jack Bates (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Crist Clark (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Owen DeLong (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Blake Hudson (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links bmanning (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Gary Buhrmaster (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Seth Mattinen (Jan 31)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Carlos Friacas (Jan 24)
- Re: IPv6: numbering of point-to-point-links Skeeve Stevens (Jan 24)