nanog mailing list archives
Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters
From: George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 15:49:09 -0800
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:59:12 PST, George Herbert said:It's easy to say "Well, foo on them", but for those of us who provide services or consulting to those who failed to follow the directions, we still have to deal with it.Just remember that if they *had* followed the directions, your billable hours would drop...
I had intended a snappy response including mention of ponies, however, while I was considering whether it was list-appropriate or not a coworker emailed me in response to this thread and reminded me of the mutual former client who grabbed 2/8 a few years ago and used it extensively internally. "Let's just grab 2/8, it's not routed on the Internet..." Whose actual perpetrator was allegedly another NANOGer, so it wasn't even brute ignorance (I am not sure it was them, so if not my apologies). In slight defense, this was to handle problems with extensive conflicts where this company and a number of telcos were having widespread 10/8 1918 space collisions and had no good solutions to it (apparently, the telcos failed to read 1918 closely enough and consider that any partner might ever need to route to their internal allocations). Thank you, anonymous coworker, for reminding me how glad I am that A) I'm not there at that client anymore, B) That it's turning that net off this year. *twitch* *twitch* -george -- -george william herbert george.herbert () gmail com
Current thread:
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters, (continued)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Bill Woodcock (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Brandon Butterworth (Feb 04)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters gb10hkzo-nanog (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Jared Mauch (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Sam Stickland (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Matthew Kaufman (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Mark Andrews (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters George Herbert (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters George Herbert (Feb 08)
- RE: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters R. Benjamin Kessler (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters David Barak (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters George Herbert (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Sam Stickland (Feb 09)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Joel Jaeggli (Feb 09)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Owen DeLong (Feb 09)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Lynda (Feb 08)
- Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters Benson Schliesser (Feb 08)