nanog mailing list archives

Re: quietly....

From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:38:43 -0600



On 2/15/2011 11:28 AM, David Israel wrote:

They don't want the protocol tied to how things work today; it needs to
be open to innovation and variety. And part of that is that an address
needs to be just an address, with no other significance other than being
unique and routable.  The moment an address has any significance beyond
the network layer, it's a liability waiting to happen.


+1

The rare exception being multicast. :)


Jack

Current thread:

Re: quietly...., (continued)
- - - Re: quietly.... Cameron Byrne (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 02)
    - IPv6 routing talk @ RIPE, was: Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
    - Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Mark Smith (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... sthaug (Feb 02)
    - RE: quietly.... Frank Bulk (Feb 13)
    - Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 15)
    - Re: quietly.... David Israel (Feb 15)
    - Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 15)
    - Re: quietly.... Michael Dillon (Feb 15)
    - Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 15)
    - Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 18)
    - Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
    - Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 15)
    - Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Ricky Beam (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Tony Finch (Feb 02)
    - Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)

(Thread continues...)