nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 04:01:47 -0800
On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:53 AM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:18:17PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:On 1 feb 2011, at 4:55, Jimmy Hess wrote:IPv4's not dead yet; even the first RIR exhaustion probable in 3 - 6 months doesn't end the IPv4 ride.IPv4 is very dead in the sense that it's not going to go anywhere in the future. The rest is just procrastination.taking the long view - your statement applies equally to IPv6. of course YMMV --bill
I disagree. I think there is little, if any, innovation that will continue to be put into IPv4 hence forth. I think there will be much innovation in IPv6 in the coming years. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: quietly.... Fred Baker (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... bmanning (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Adrian Chadd (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Marshall Eubanks (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Dave Israel (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Dave Israel (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... bmanning (Feb 01)