nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Fred Baker <fred () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:10:58 +0000
On Feb 1, 2011, at 4:31 AM, Jeremy wrote:
Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If this doesn't count as "future use" what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't *fix* the problem here)
yes. The bottom line is that it only gives you a few more /8s, and every host and router in the net has to be updated to accept them. Doesn't actually solve the problem.
Current thread:
- Re: quietly.... Fred Baker (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... bmanning (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Adrian Chadd (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Marshall Eubanks (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Dave Israel (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... bmanning (Feb 01)