Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

[Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>]

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Tom Limoncelli wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

> > I think you'll be in for a surprise here, too. The 4G transition is 
> > already underway. For the vendors where 4G means LTE, IPv6 is the 
> > native protocol and IPv4 requires a certain amount of hackery to 
> > operate.
>
> I'm writing an article where I want to say that but I can't find an
> article I can reference to back it up.

We're an LTE operator and this is the first time I've heard about this. 
LTE supports IPv4 and IPv6 and as far as I can discern, that is a 
requirement, and there is no "hackery" to get IPv4 running.

We have yet to see any LTE terminals (USB dongels so far) that support 
IPv6. There are a lot of other kinks to work out first, going IPv6 only 
here is definitely not the place. Remember, a lot of people buying this 
service is taking the USB dongle and attaching it to their corporate XP 
laptop.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se