nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...


From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:07:26 -0200


On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote:

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments along these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB 
was coming out with http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1814.txt.  Given the publication of 1814, you can probably guess how 
far those arguments fared.

You missed the "anticipates external connectivity to the Internet" part.  Networks that never touch the internet have 
RFC1918 address space to use. (and that works 99.999% of the time.)


        Except in acquisitions and private peering.

as

Current thread: