![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:57:47 +0000
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:06 -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP! Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill!
Pfft. Everyone knows that Fibre Channel's going to replace everything... The minute we get those 128Gbit/sec transmission characteristics, Ethernet's gonna be as good as RS-485.
Current thread:
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Hill (Dec 29)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Holmes,David A (Dec 29)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tei (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Aiden Sullivan (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vadim Antonov (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Hill (Dec 29)