nanog mailing list archives
next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 10:06:55 -0500
(you forgot to change subj:) On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
Next topic, ethernet is too chaotic and inefficient to deploy and support mission critical applications in LAN or WAN or data center.
yes, let's get something with say fixed sized packets, ability to have predictable jitter and also, for fun, no more STP! Ethernet is too complex, maybe something simpler? I hear there's this new tech 'ATM'? it seems to fit the bill! :) (Happy new year almost)
Current thread:
- next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Christopher Morrow (Dec 29)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Hill (Dec 29)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Holmes,David A (Dec 29)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tei (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Aiden Sullivan (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Hill (Dec 29)