nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPTV and ASM
From: Mike McBride <mmcbride7 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:19:14 -0800
Marshall, On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks () gmail com> wrote:
Dear Mike; On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mike McBride <mmcbride7 () gmail com> wrote:Anyone using ASM (versus SSM) for IPTV? If so why?From what I understand, the answer is likely to be "yes" and the reason is likely to be "deployed equipment only supports IGMP v2."
Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers, that non igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other reasons such as reducing state. Or is this a non issue and everyone is using SSM with IPTV? thanks, mike
Regards Marshallthanks, mike
Current thread:
- IPTV and ASM Mike McBride (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Marshall Eubanks (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mike McBride (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Jeff Tantsura (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Glen Kent (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Keegan Holley (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mike McBride (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Marshall Eubanks (Dec 28)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Mark Tinka (Dec 29)
- Re: IPTV and ASM Curtis, Bruce (Dec 29)