nanog mailing list archives
Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:14:58 -0700
o Trust model (how much trust is put in whom so that connectivity works) o How much state where o Security implications (where are the weak links, vectors for attack) o Traffic engineering (ingress and egress) features o Session survivability on rerouting (manual and due to outages)- complexity (define a metric [eek!] ...)
good luck with that one
- overhead (who, what, where, why..[closely tied with the "state" question]) - who benefits and who pays? endpoints? backbones ISPs in the DFZ? SMB? Enterprises? Router companies? ... it's like Lenin said, you look for the person who will benefit and...
i think of this as 'economic model.' what will change from the current model? privacy has also been suggested as an issue. randy
Current thread:
- LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Daniel Roesen (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Cameron Byrne (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Cameron Byrne (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Daniel Roesen (Aug 20)