nanog mailing list archives
Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want?
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:06:54 -0700
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:57:36PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:as you can see, i am interested in o loc/id separation o rounting table scaling o deployability on the internet o current state of development what did i miss? what major attributes interest you?o Trust model (how much trust is put in whom so that connectivity works) o How much state where o Security implications (where are the weak links, vectors for attack) o Traffic engineering (ingress and egress) features o Session survivability on rerouting (manual and due to outages)
- complexity (define a metric [eek!] ...) - overhead (who, what, where, why..[closely tied with the "state" question]) - who benefits and who pays? endpoints? backbones ISPs in the DFZ? SMB? Enterprises? Router companies? ... it's like Lenin said, you look for the person who will benefit and...
Current thread:
- LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Daniel Roesen (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Cameron Byrne (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Randy Bush (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Cameron Byrne (Aug 20)
- Re: LISP/ILNP/RFC6296 - what do you want? Daniel Roesen (Aug 20)