nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:52:34 +0300
On (2011-08-13 22:44 +1000), Jeffrey S. Young wrote:
That's interesting and if true would represent a real change. Can you list the larger SPs in the US that use OSPF?
AT&T, L3? Anyhow I fully agree with the sentiment that in eu/us markets most SP rock ISIS. At one time when I was shopping for testing gear, one box I tested was Anritsu, which is pretty nice box for its price range, but I couldn't use it due to lack of ISIS emulation. Anritsu sales guy asked their engineers why they didn't do ISIS, answer was because no one uses ISIS. But I guess their focus is asia. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS, (continued)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS Leigh Porter (Aug 17)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS CJ (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS jim deleskie (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS CJ (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS James Jones (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Saku Ytti (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Hill (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Scott Morris (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Scott Morris (Aug 12)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS Doug Marschke (Aug 16)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeff Wheeler (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Douglas Otis (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jimmy Hess (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 11)