Re: Experience with Juniper MX-80s

[Bill Blackford <bblackford () gmail com>]

I'm probably way off here, but: Imagine an MX with a single RE, 1
MX-MPC2-3D-Q that can be populated with your choice of MICs in FPC-1
and 1 MIC-3D-4XGE-XFP in FPC-0. But, they run a little hot.

-b



On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Brian Keefer <chort () smtps net> wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2011, at 6:43 AM, Babak Pasdar wrote:
>
> > Hello NANOG Group,
> >
> > I am curious if anyone has any experiences positive or negative with Juniper MX-80s.  Our recent experience with 
> > Juniper has not been great both in terms of new product offerings (SRX) and software bugs in the recent revs of 
> > Junos for the MX platform.  I want to know if the MX-80 functions as advertised and in specific can properly handle 
> > two full IPv4 and IPv6 BGP feeds
>
>
> I'm curious about these too.  Specifically, does anyone have experience/thoughts on the anti-DDoS features?  I know 
> there are scenarios it wouldn't begin to address, but are they worth spending time to fiddle with?  Also, is anyone 
> taking JFlow off of them?  We're trying to figure out how much we could sample while doing about 900Mbps.  I'm not 
> sure what our PPS looks like off the top of my head.
>
> TIA.
>
> --
> chort



-- 
Bill Blackford
Network Engineer

Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....