nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:01:42 -0400
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:30:45 CDT, =?utf-8?B?R1AgV29vZGVu?= said:
wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ...
RFC1149 says: Avian carriers can provide high delay, low throughput, and low altitude service. The connection topology is limited to a single point-to-point path for each carrier, used with standard carriers, but many carriers can be used without significant interference with each other, outside of early spring. This is because of the 3D ether space available to the carriers, in contrast to the 1D ether used by IEEE802.3. The carriers have an intrinsic collision avoidance system, which increases availability. The carriers are also (over time) self-regenerating in case one gets lost or corrupted due to collision or interception...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers?, (continued)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Steven Bellovin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jay Ashworth (Apr 03)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Robert Bonomi (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Morris (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jeroen van Aart (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Brim (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Leo Bicknell (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jay Ashworth (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Dorn Hetzel (Apr 01)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Justin M. Streiner (Apr 01)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Dorn Hetzel (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Cutler James R (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Brandon Ross (Apr 01)