Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
> Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
>
> That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny 
> that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.

Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now.  rfc6214 gives us a new
brown M&M to put into the contracts...

Attachment: _bin
Description: