nanog mailing list archives
RE: riverbed steelhead
From: "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant () shortestpathfirst net>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:58:19 -0400
-----Original Message----- From: harbor235 [mailto:harbor235 () gmail com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 2:50 PM To: NANOG list Subject: riverbed steelhead Anyone out there have experience with Riverbed Steelhead products? Do they improve TCP performance over WAN links? is it worth the price?
I've had generally good experiences w/ Riverbed's Steelhead as well as Juniper's WX Series product. For certain types of applications, like email and database replication you can expect to see pretty dramatic reductions in throughput because of the technique of replacing symbols for otherwise long strings of repeatable characters. Also because of the local proxying abilities with regards to TCP ACKs and such, you can also get better pipelining of traffic... As far as whether they are worth the price, this really boils down to a proper Cost/Benefit analysis, but most of the ROI calculators show a return after as little as just a few months. Stefan Fouant
Current thread:
- riverbed steelhead harbor235 (Apr 21)
- RE: riverbed steelhead Stefan Fouant (Apr 21)
- RE: riverbed steelhead Stefan Fouant (Apr 21)
- RE: riverbed steelhead Stephens, Josh (Apr 21)
- Re: riverbed steelhead Joel Maslak (Apr 21)
- Re: riverbed steelhead Jonathan Fernatt (Apr 21)
- Re: riverbed steelhead Andrey Khomyakov (Apr 25)
- Re: riverbed steelhead James Michael Keller (Apr 25)
- Re: riverbed steelhead Eric Cables (Apr 25)
- Re: riverbed steelhead Andrey Khomyakov (Apr 25)
- RE: riverbed steelhead Stefan Fouant (Apr 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: riverbed steelhead Elijah Savage (Apr 27)