nanog mailing list archives
RE: Comcast's 6to4 Relays
From: Antonio Querubin <tony () lavanauts org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:53:48 -1000 (HST)
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bhoomi Jain wrote:
To give you an idea, a lot of the Internet in India depends on the service of the Tata companies, with international routing coming from Tata Communications AS 6453. Announcing 192.88.99.0/24 to 6453 as a customer, I would worry about its treatment as BGP best-path, in place of closer 6to4 relays. As you understand, these circuits are very far away, and also very full. This is not something I would recommend.
Perhaps you should try convincing Tata to setup their own 6to4 relay so they can provide a better experience for their own customers who, for whatever reason, may not be able to get or use native IPv6 for quite some time.
-- Antonio Querubin e-mail: tony () lavanauts org xmpp: antonioquerubin () gmail com
Current thread:
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays, (continued)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Steven Bellovin (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Jim Gettys (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Doug Barton (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays TJ (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Matthew Petach (Apr 19)
- RE: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Antonio Querubin (Apr 19)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Owen DeLong (Apr 20)
- RE: Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Bhoomi Jain (Apr 20)
- Re: Comcast's 6to4 Relays Owen DeLong (Apr 20)