nanog mailing list archives
Re: Randy in Nevis
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:29:49 -0700
On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:"Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465" does not sound like a 587 problem to me. netalyzr folks? comment?Sorry, I hit send too soon ... I've heard from a couple of people that the PIX will remap 587 (and 25) to oddball ports if you fiddle the config just right. Given all the other bogosity that box does with SMTP I wonder if there's truth to the rumour. (I haven't found anyone who can reproduce this on demand, so it's still apocryphal for now.)
465 is not an odd-ball port, it's the standard well-known port for STMPS. Fortunately, few people actually use SMTPS, preferring instead to do their security via TLS using the STARTTLS model after connecting to 25/587. Owen
Current thread:
- Randy in Nevis Rudolph Daniel (Sep 19)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Randy Bush (Sep 19)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Jeffrey Lyon (Sep 19)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Lyndon Nerenberg (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Lyndon Nerenberg (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 27)
- RE: Randy in Nevis Michael K. Smith - Adhost (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Owen DeLong (Sep 27)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Leo Vegoda (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Seth Mattinen (Sep 28)
- RE: Randy in Nevis Nathan Eisenberg (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis John Peach (Sep 28)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Bjørn Mork (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis John Peach (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Chris Boyd (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Bjørn Mork (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis John Peach (Sep 29)
- Re: Randy in Nevis Randy Bush (Sep 19)