nanog mailing list archives
Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :)
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 02:49:49 -0700
On Oct 20, 2010, at 2:09 AM, George Bonser wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: George Bonser Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:30 AM To: Owen DeLong Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: RE: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) It isn't "easy" but it isn't the fault of "v6" in most cases.Put another way, the set of challenges facing the enterprise/production operator (the people who use that network to facilitate the delivery of a product ... either on the transmitting or receiving end of that delivery) is quite different from the set of challenges that face a pure network operator. And what seems so easy for one may not be so easy for the other. Dual stacking network gear is less of a problem than dual stacking hundreds or thousands of servers, special purpose appliances, software, etc. of different vendors, ages, and complexity.
I'm not sure why you assume that network operators don't have hundreds or thousands of servers, special purpose appliances, software, etc. of different vendors, ages, and complexity. Yes, it's easier to dual-stack the backbone of an ISP than the entire enterprise of an ISP. That's no surprise since dual-stacking the backbone of an enterprise would be easier than dual-stacking the entire enterprise as well. However, other than some very limited exceptions, HE has dual-stacked their entire enterprise, not just their backbone. All of our public facing servers are fully dual-stacked with published AAAA records. Our customers can freely run IPv4, IPv6, or both on our managed servers and/or their own equipment in our colos. All of our IP connectivity clients have access to dual-stack services, and, we actually provide economic incentives for customers to do dual-stack rather than IPv4 only connections to us. Migrating from IPv4 to dual stack isn't going to get significantly easier by procrastinating at this point. It's only going to get more urgent. Doing something hard on a schedule is hard. Doing something hard in a rush because you failed to schedule it is harder. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA, (continued)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA gordon b slater (Oct 19)
- Message not available
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Matthew Walster (Oct 20)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Jens Link (Oct 19)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Mark Smith (Oct 19)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Joel Jaeggli (Oct 19)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) bmanning (Oct 19)
- RE: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) George Bonser (Oct 19)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) Owen DeLong (Oct 20)
- RE: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) George Bonser (Oct 20)
- RE: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) George Bonser (Oct 20)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) Owen DeLong (Oct 20)
- RE: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) George Bonser (Oct 20)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) Ray Soucy (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) bmanning (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) Michael Dillon (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 ... WRONG! :) Bryan Irvine (Oct 21)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Henning Brauer (Oct 18)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Seth Mattinen (Oct 18)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Owen DeLong (Oct 18)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Joel Jaeggli (Oct 18)
- Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA Jared Mauch (Oct 18)