nanog mailing list archives
Re: network name 101100010100110.net
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:26:28 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:33:13 -0700 From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> Subject: Re: network name 101100010100110.net On 10/17/10 8:24 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:That's why 3M registered mmm.com back in 1988.and not just because minnestoaminingandmanufacturing.com is hard to type...
Like they had that choice _then_. 14 character limit. <grin>
they've since officially change the name of the company to 3m...
Current thread:
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Roland Perry (Oct 19)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net David Shaw (Oct 19)
- RE: network name 101100010100110.net Deepak Jain (Oct 19)
- RE: network name 101100010100110.net Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 19)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net bmanning (Oct 19)
- RE: network name 101100010100110.net Tony Finch (Oct 20)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Roland Perry (Oct 19)