nanog mailing list archives
Re: network name 101100010100110.net
From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:23:45 -0500 (CDT)
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com () nanog org Sun Oct 17 22:23:13 2010 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:24:30 -0700 Subject: Re: network name 101100010100110.net From: Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com> To: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> Cc: bmanning () vacation karoshi com, nanog () nanog org That's why 3M registered mmm.com back in 1988.
Not to mention the fact that the company was originally _named_ "Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing", and that '3M' was *just* a logo and trademark.
Current thread:
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net, (continued)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Tony Finch (Oct 18)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Steve Atkins (Oct 17)
- Message not available
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Roland Perry (Oct 19)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net David Shaw (Oct 19)
- RE: network name 101100010100110.net Deepak Jain (Oct 19)
- RE: network name 101100010100110.net Nathan Eisenberg (Oct 19)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net bmanning (Oct 19)
- RE: network name 101100010100110.net Tony Finch (Oct 20)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Roland Perry (Oct 19)