nanog mailing list archives

Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption - Sparse IPv6 allocation


From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:27:39 -0400

Randy - 
 
  We'll likely put that out to the ARIN community for consultation
  at the point in time when becomes a potential issue. I expect we 
  will have plenty of time before that needs to be considered at the
  present rate of allocation.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:

John,

Can you tell us at what degree the bisection stops?  i.e. does it keep going until there are no spaces left, or will 
you leave some space in between each one to leave some room for future needs for orgs that already have allocations?


-Randy

--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
----

----- Original Message -----
On Oct 18, 2010, at 2:18 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 6:59 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
ARIN does reservations (unsure at what length, but at least down to
/31).

Do they still do that? Back when I was at IANA, one of the
justifications the RIRs gave for the /12s they received was that
they were going to be using the 'bisection' method of allocation
which removes the need for reservation. Last I heard, APNIC was
using the bisection method...

ARIN is doing the same (the 'bisection' method) with our IPv6
management
since January 2010: we refer to the "sparse allocation" approach and
it
was requested by the community during the ARIN/NANOG Dearborn meeting.

FYI,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN



Current thread: