nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:20:04 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010, Christopher Morrow wrote:
oh, so it occurs to me that when I read the original post I read it as 'mpls network' not 'mpls p2p link', I suppose if the OP was looking for an L2 circuit emulated across an MPLS network ... that's the same thing as a wave (basically) at the customer hand off.
That's why one never should use "MPLS" when talking about customer connections, unless they're actually carriers carrier or something like that.
L2 or L3 VPN is fine, that is a service, MPLS is a way to produce that service. Asking for "MPLS connectivity" is just asking for misunderstandings.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity, (continued)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Steven Fischer (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Brandon Kim (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Brandon Kim (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Brandon Kim (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Richard A Steenbegen (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Ryan Finnesey (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Seth Mattinen (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Seth Mattinen (Oct 09)