nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 00:58:02 -0400
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us> wrote:
On 10/9/10 5:08 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:We have been looking into Sprint but one issue we are running into is lack of IPv6 support. So we are looking into Level3 and Global. I think Equinix may also have its own connectivity they can sell you.Um, if you order an MPLS connection between two distant sites, doesn't the provider normally (in my experience) just hand you ports that are effectively layer 2? IPvAnything doesn't even factor in.
oh, so it occurs to me that when I read the original post I read it as 'mpls network' not 'mpls p2p link', I suppose if the OP was looking for an L2 circuit emulated across an MPLS network ... that's the same thing as a wave (basically) at the customer hand off. -chris
Current thread:
- Equinix MPLS connectivity Leo Woltz (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Steven Fischer (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Brandon Kim (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Brandon Kim (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Brandon Kim (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Richard A Steenbegen (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Jared Mauch (Oct 09)
- RE: Equinix MPLS connectivity Ryan Finnesey (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Seth Mattinen (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Christopher Morrow (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 09)
- Re: Equinix MPLS connectivity Seth Mattinen (Oct 09)