nanog mailing list archives
Re: router lifetime
From: Patrick Stueck <patrick () excalibursystems net>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 00:02:19 -0500
I still have a few Cisco 2600 Series routers in service from 9 years ago. Some of those here soon are being replaced with the 2800/3800 series integrated service routers. These routers don't handle a lot as far as traffic, so even the 2600 series routers are still performing the tasks at hand very well. Only moving to the newer series routers to get everything in one "package". -- *__________________________ Patrick Stueck Director of Operations* Microsoft Certified Professional | Web and Software Developer | Systems Engineer *Confidentiality Notice: *This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
Current thread:
- Re: router lifetime, (continued)
- Re: router lifetime Heath Jones (Oct 02)
- RE: router lifetime Brandon Kim (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Franck Martin (Oct 02)
- RE: router lifetime Brandon Kim (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime jim deleskie (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Mark Smith (Oct 03)
- Re: router lifetime Franck Martin (Oct 03)
- RE: router lifetime Brandon Kim (Oct 03)
- Re: router lifetime Chris Woodfield (Oct 03)
- Re: router lifetime Heath Jones (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Patrick Stueck (Oct 02)
- Re: router lifetime Jon Lewis (Oct 04)