Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?

[Randy Carpenter <rcarpen () network1 net>]

I think ARIN is now doing sparse allocations on /28 boundaries.

My personal opinion is that it should be even more sparse, and that allocations should be done on nibble boundaries.  
Any reasonably-sized ISP should get at least a /28.

I deal with many small-ish ISPs, and most are 5,000-10,000 users. Those are probably served by a /32 for quite some 
time. When you get into the ones that are 20,000-50,000, it gets tricker to deal with. Those should get a /28. The 
mega-ISPs should get a /24, or even a /20.

Another problem is that the allocations from IANA to the RIRs are too small to begin with. If there are 5 RIRs, why 
does there have to be so much fragmentation? It is too late for that, though.

Anyway, I think there are some proposals floating around (Owen? ;-) ) That would make the /32,/28,/24 (nibble boundary) 
idea into policy. We'll have to wait and see what happens.

-Randy

--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
----

----- Original Message -----
> On 26/10/2010 17:23, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > He's talking about the bloat that comes from ISPs getting
> > slow-started and then
> > only being able to increase their network in increments of 2x each
> > time, so,
> > effectively ISP gets:
> [...]
> > Probably not quite as bad as IPv4, but, potentially close.
>
> In theory, yes, it's bad.
>
> In practice, the RIRs are implementing sparse allocation which makes
> it
> possible to aggregate subsequent allocations. I.e. not as bad as it
> may seem.
>
> ARIN, RIPE and AfriNIC, for example, allocate on /29 boundaries. So if
> you
> get an initial allocation of /32, then find you need more, your
> subsequent
> allocations will be taken from the same /29, allowing aggregation up
> to /29.
>
> APNIC seem to be delegating on /22 boundaries, and LACNIC on /28.
>
> Nick