nanog mailing list archives
Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses)
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:54:35 -0500
On 10/23/2010 2:07 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
However, deliberate routing of ULA will start small and slowly spread over time like a slow-growing cancer. You won't even really detect it until it has metastasized to such an extent that nothing can be done about it.
Which is why all v6 templates really need to get this in as a discard/filter/etc, just as we do with RFC-1918. I'm not saying it is perfect, but based on how much bogon lists have hurt legitimate traffic, we know the templates are at least used.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses), (continued)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Joe Hamelin (Oct 21)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Jack Bates (Oct 21)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Joel Jaeggli (Oct 21)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) William Herrin (Oct 22)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 22)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Ray Soucy (Oct 22)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) William Herrin (Oct 22)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 23)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Jack Bates (Oct 23)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) William Herrin (Oct 23)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) William Herrin (Oct 21)
- Re: Why ULA: low collision chance (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses Ray Soucy (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses Owen DeLong (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses Ray Soucy (Oct 21)
- Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses Allen Smith (Oct 21)
- Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses) Jeroen Massar (Oct 21)