nanog mailing list archives
Re: Jumbo frame Question
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:58:25 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Randy Bush wrote:
the reason ieee has not allowed upping of the frame size is that the crc is at the prudent limits at 1500. yes, we do another check above the frame (uh, well, udp4 may not), but the ether spec can not count on that.
<http://staff.psc.edu/mathis/MTU/arguments.html#crc> seems to disagree? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Jumbo frame Question, (continued)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Jon Meek (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question Richard Graves (RHT) (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question George Bonser (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Saku Ytti (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Saku Ytti (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Saku Ytti (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question Brandon Kim (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Randy Bush (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question George Bonser (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question John Kristoff (Nov 29)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Jack Bates (Nov 29)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Douglas Otis (Nov 29)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Jon Meek (Nov 26)
- need a contact Geo. (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Joel Jaeggli (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Matthew Petach (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Wil Schultz (Nov 26)