nanog mailing list archives
Re: Jumbo frame Question
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:39:55 -0500
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:26:30 +0200, Saku Ytti said:
You are theoretically winning 4.2%, which works only internally in your network, so maybe you'll be able to capitalize on that 4.2% on backup traffic or so. Doesn't seem like that critical win to be honest.
That's only half the calculation. The *other* half is if you have gear that has a packets-per-second issue - if you go to 9000 MTU, you can move 6 times as much data in the same packets-per-second. Anybody who's ever had to trim a complicated ACL list because it saturated the CPU knows what I mean.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Jumbo frame Question Harris Hui (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Hank Nussbacher (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Jon Meek (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question Richard Graves (RHT) (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question George Bonser (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Saku Ytti (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Saku Ytti (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Saku Ytti (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question Brandon Kim (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Randy Bush (Nov 26)
- RE: Jumbo frame Question George Bonser (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 26)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question John Kristoff (Nov 29)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Jack Bates (Nov 29)
- Re: Jumbo frame Question Douglas Otis (Nov 29)
- need a contact Geo. (Nov 26)