nanog mailing list archives
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:05:51 -0500
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:14, Scott Morris <swm () emanon com> wrote:
If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful. ;) Scott
If we can't choose mouthful (which for some reason sounds thematically correct), "chunk" gets my vote. *(Chunk = Maybe not the most technical, but has been working for me all along ...)* /TJ
Current thread:
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming, (continued)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Scott Morris (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming William Pitcock (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Cutler James R (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Scott Morris (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Daniel Holme (Nov 20)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Daniel Holme (Nov 20)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Lamar Owen (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming TJ (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Janet Sullivan (Nov 26)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Michael Dillon (Nov 26)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Frank Habicht (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Jay Nugent (Nov 19)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)