nanog mailing list archives
Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:05:57 +0100
For the sake of completeness, the relevant part of what I answered privately can be found below. On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 13:22, Jeff Aitken <jaitken () aitken com> wrote:
[ Meant to send this to the list and not directly to Richard. ] On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:07:40AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:If any of you have any additional suggestions, you are more than welcome to share them.
I will add quad to -03 anyway. If you get a few +1 on hexquad, I am against adding that, as well. Richard
Current thread:
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming, (continued)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Nick Hilliard (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 22)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming George Bonser (Nov 22)
- RE: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming kmedcalf () dessus com (Nov 26)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Owen DeLong (Nov 26)
- Conclusions? - Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Joel Jaeggli (Nov 29)
- Re: Conclusions? - Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Doug Barton (Nov 29)
- Re: [v6ops] Conclusions? - Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 30)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Jeff Aitken (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Daniel Hagerty (Nov 22)
- Re: Introducing draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming Richard Hartmann (Nov 22)