nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter?


From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:47:57 -0800

On 11/18/2010 14:24, George, Wes E [NTK] wrote:>
[WES] Bill, I know that you mean well and you're just trying to push IPv6
deployment, and sometimes a little public shame goes a long way, but in the
future, before you call my company out in public with tenuous assertions
like this, please at least try to reach out to me privately to address your
perceived issue with the way Sprint is handling IPv6 rollout? It's not like
I'm hard to find, even if it's a blast message to NANOG that looks like
"Will someone with IPv6 clue at Sprint contact me?"
 

Me, personally, I have had absolutely zero issues with Sprint and
requesting IPv6. The process was extremely smooth and at no point did my
rep or their support engineers ever tell me it was not available. There
was an easy questionnaire I had to fill out, but that was it.

~Seth


Current thread: