nanog mailing list archives

Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter?

From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:22:09 +0100

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:10:56PM -0800, Ryan Finnesey wrote:

Sprint keeps telling us they do not yet support IPv6.


http://www.sprintv6.net/sprintlink_ipv6_overview.html

Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

Current thread:

Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? William Herrin (Nov 18)
- Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Seth Mattinen (Nov 18)
  - RE: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Ryan Finnesey (Nov 18)
    - Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Daniel Roesen (Nov 18)
    - Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Seth Mattinen (Nov 18)
  - Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Jay Hennigan (Nov 18)
- RE: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Paul Stewart (Nov 18)
- Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Owen DeLong (Nov 18)
- Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Jack Bates (Nov 18)
- RE: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? George, Wes E [NTK] (Nov 18)
  - Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Seth Mattinen (Nov 18)
  - Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? William Herrin (Nov 18)
    - RE: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? George Bonser (Nov 18)
  - Re: Why is your company treating IPv6 turn ups as a sales matter? Jay Hennigan (Nov 19)

(Thread continues...)