nanog mailing list archives
Re: Mikrotik BGP Question
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:34:40 +0200
* George Bonser:
Well, I believe the original poster said that one of his colleagues swore that BGP multihoming wouldn't work unless both feeds terminated on the same router. I suppose said colleague has never heard of iBGP between two routers of the local AS. Those two routers should probably take a full table and exchange them between the two but going inside the network, yeah, they should probably simply originate a default into the the ospf routing.
Does this really work that well? Won't you still get loops or blackholes unless the eBGP routes on all border routers are identical? I think you also need iBGP speakers along all feasible paths between eBGP speakers.
Current thread:
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question, (continued)
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question Christopher Morrow (May 21)
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question Choprboy (May 21)
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question joel jaeggli (May 21)
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question Ingo Flaschberger (May 21)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question Lorell Hathcock (May 22)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question Ingo Flaschberger (May 22)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question Lorell Hathcock (May 22)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question Ingo Flaschberger (May 23)
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question joel jaeggli (May 23)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question George Bonser (May 23)
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question Florian Weimer (May 24)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question George Bonser (May 24)
- Re: Mikrotik BGP Question Florian Weimer (May 24)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question Lorell Hathcock (May 22)
- RE: Mikrotik BGP Question Lorell Hathcock (May 24)