nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Mark Newton <newton () internode com au>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:57:27 +1030
On 23/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
With the smaller routing table afforded by IPv6, this will be less expensive. As a result, I suspect there will be more IPv6 small multihomers. That's generally a good thing.
Puzzled: How does the IPv6 routing table get smaller? There's currently social pressure against deaggregation, but given time why do you think the same drivers that lead to v4 deaggregation won't also lead to v6 deaggregation? (small multihomers means more discontiguous blocks of PI space too, right?) - mark -- Mark Newton Email: newton () internode com au (W) Network Engineer Email: newton () atdot dotat org (H) Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999 "Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
Current thread:
- Re: IP4 Space, (continued)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 18)
- Re: IP4 Space Stan Barber (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Simon Perreault (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Daniel Senie (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 22)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space William Herrin (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Tim Durack (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Christopher Morrow (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space bmanning (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 23)
- Re: IP4 Space bmanning (Mar 23)